Wishing you all a happy, healthy and compliant New Year.
Archive for December, 2009
Last Post of the Year
Thursday, December 31st, 2009SEC Publishes Custody Rule
Thursday, December 31st, 2009The SEC has posted the Final Rule: Custody of Funds or Securities of Client by Investment Advisers. I will take the next few days to digest its contents and post my opinion in the days to come.
Transitioning from State to SEC Registration
Wednesday, December 30th, 2009Introduction
As advisory firms begin the annual ritual of tallying up their assets under management (AUM), it seemed like an appropriate time to detail the steps involved in switching from state to SEC registration. Though not a difficult process in and of itself, like all things that involve the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, it does have its pitfalls and dangers. Besides, we realize that most advisers consider any interaction with the Investment Adviser Registration Depository (IARD) a form of cruel and unusual punishment. Therefore, in keeping with the charitable nature of the holiday season, our gift to all those advisers making the switch from state to SEC registration is to demystify the process and help ease the transition.
Eligibility and Timing
While most advisers know that they may apply for registration with the SEC when their AUM reaches $25 million and are required to apply for registration with the SEC when their AUM reaches $30 million, many advisers are unsure about the timing of such registration. We often get calls during the year from frantic advisers who report to us that their AUM has just hit $30,000,000.01 and that they must immediately apply for registration with the SEC. Though we certainly are willing to help our clients transition to SEC registration at any time they so desire (if eligible, that is), most, if not all, breath a great sigh of relief when we tell them that they are only required to initiate the registration process if they report AUM of at least $30 million on their annual updating amendment. In other words, even if your AUM equals or exceeds $30 million during the year, it is the advisory firm’s AUM as of December 31st that triggers SEC registration.
Our clients are even more appreciative when we tell them that they can delay having to apply for registration with the SEC until as late as June 31st if they so choose. How is this so? Since advisers have until March 31st of each year to file their annual updating amendment and then an additional 90 days to then apply for SEC registration, the calendar reads mid-year before the first document must be filed.
Mind you, we are not advocating that an adviser delay registration. Indeed, many advisers are rightly proud of becoming eligible for SEC registration and want to begin the process shortly after filing their annual updating amendment. Other advisers, however, are wary of the compliance obligations attendant to SEC registration and are thankful for the short reprieve. We suggest to all advisers that they use the time leading up to their application for SEC registration to review their compliance policies and procedures and to make sure they are in full compliance with the rather onerous dictates of the Investment Advisers Act.
How to Apply
Quite simply, an adviser files for SEC registration by logging onto the IARD system, clicking on “New Filing” under the heading ADV and under ADV Filing Types choosing “Apply for Registration as an Investment Adviser with the SEC.” Because the adviser is already registered with at least one state and “entitled” to use the IARD system, the adviser will find that the Form ADV that shows up on the screen is already pre-populated with all of the adviser’s information. As a matter of fact, if the adviser immediately runs a completeness check they will discover that only two pieces of additional information (besides signatures) are needed to complete this form:
Item 2 - SEC Registration
Under Section A of Item 2, the adviser must select one of the eleven types of eligibility for SEC registration. Almost 100% of the time an adviser will select the first eligibility category - assets under management of $25 million or more. Under Section B of Item 2, the adviser must select the states in which the adviser will notice file. Initially these are the states in which they maintain their current state registrations.
Schedule A - Direct Owners/Executive Officers
The only requirement here is that the advisory firm must designate someone as Chief Compliance Officer.
Next, sign the document on both the State Registered Investment Adviser Execution Page (remember the advisory firm is still exclusively state registered) and the Domestic Investment Adviser Execution Page, press the Submit button and congratulate yourself on a job well done. Within 45 days after you file your Form ADV registration application, the SEC must grant your registration or begin proceedings to deny it, assuming that you have fully and properly completed all items of the form and accompanying schedules. The SEC staff will return any Form ADV that is not fully and properly completed. A new 45 day period will begin when the Form ADV is resubmitted.
Withdrawal from State Registration
Do not - repeat do not - withdraw from state registration until you have been notified that you are registered with SEC. If you withdraw from your state registration prior to the effective date of your SEC registration, you will be no longer be a registered investment adviser.
After you first become registered with the SEC, you will, for a brief period of time, be both a state registered and SEC registered adviser. Do not worry about this as this is a common occurrence and does not subject you to increased regulatory scrutiny. Unless you are leaving a trail of fraud and deceit in your wake, state regulators will now leave you alone.
Form ADV-W
Once your registration with the SEC becomes effective you can then begin the process of withdrawing from state registration. This is done by filing the Form ADV-W, also via the IARD system. After logging onto the IARD system, the adviser should select “New Filing” under the heading ADV-W. You will immediately be assaulted by a full page warning in bright red lettering, the crux of which is that by submitting Form ADV-W to withdraw your advisory firm from registration may affect the registration of your firm’s investment adviser representatives.
At the bottom of the warning page you are given two options - Full Withdraw and Partial Withdrawal. Click on Partial Withdrawal link to begin the process.
The first section of the Form ADV-W is entitled “Status.” You will notice that the answer to the question “Check the box that indicates what you would like to do” has already been answered as follows: Withdraw from registration in some, but not all, of the jurisdictions with which you are registered (a “partial withdraw”). If, for some reason, this answer has not been selected, you should check it off. The next question in the Status section asks you to indicate the jurisdictions from which you are withdrawing your investment adviser registration. Skip choice “(a)” which would withdraw you from the SEC and under choice “(b)” check off those states in which you are currently registered as an investment adviser.
Item 1 on Form ADV-W concerns the advisory firm’s identifying information and will be pre-populated with the required content. It is prudent to give this a quick review. Item 2 inquires as to whether you (e.g., your advisory firm) have ceased conducting advisory business in the jurisdictions from which you are withdrawing. The answer to this should be “no” as you most likely have notice filed in the same states from which you are now withdrawing as a state-registered adviser. In the space provided for “reasons for withdrawal” you should write “Switching from state to SEC registration.”
Item 3 asks whether you or a related person have custody of client assets. Remember, for purposes of the Form ADV-W, your advisory firm will have custody if it directly or indirectly holds client funds or securities, has any authority to obtain possession of them, or has the ability to appropriate them. Your firm has custody, for example, if it has a general power of attorney over a client’s account or signatory power over a client’s checking account. For purposes of the Form ADV-W your firm does not have custody by the mere fact it directly deducts its advisory fees from client accounts. If your firm does have custody, you must then provide the number of clients for whom you have custody of cash or securities; the amount of clients’ cash for which you have custody; the market value of clients’ securities for which you have custody and the market value of any other assets for which you have custody.
Item 4 asks whether your advisory firm has received any advisory fees for investment advisory services or publications that you have not rendered or delivered; or (ii) borrowed any money from clients that you have not repaid. If so, you will be required to provide amounts of any such money. Item 5 inquires as to whether your advisory firm has assigned any of its investment advisory contracts to another person. If the answer is yes, you will need to list each person to whom you assigned any of your advisory contracts on Schedule W1 of the Form ADV-W. Item 6 asks if there are any unsatisfied judgments or liens against your advisory firm.
Pursuant to Item 7, if you answered “yes” to Item 3 (Custody); Item 4 (Money Owed to Clients) or Item 6 (Judgments and Liens) you must complete Schedule W2 of the Form ADV-W. This is where you are required to disclose the nature and amount of your advisory firm’s assets and liabilities and its net worth as of the last day of the month prior to the filing of the Form ADV-W.
Item 8 requires (i) the name and address of each person who has or will have custody or possession of your books and records; and (ii) each location at which any of your books and records are or will be kept. You must list this information on Schedule W1, and you must complete a separate Schedule W1 for each person who has or will have custody of your books and records at each location. The instructions to Form ADV-W contains useful information to assist you in completing this section correctly.
The only remaining task is to sign the Execution Page, click on the “Completeness Check” button in the left hand column and, if everything is set to go, click on the “Submit” button.
Good Luck and Happy Holidays!
Important Information
The information contained in this article is only a summary of the rules and regulations that apply to state-registered investment advisers. It is not intended to be a comprehensive analysis of the rules and regulations applicable to state-registered investment advisers. It is not intended to constitute legal or compliance consulting advice or apply to any one investment adviser’s particular situation. If you are in need of further information or have specific questions regarding the compliance obligations applicable to the conduct of your investment advisory business, please contact U.S. Compliance Consultants toll free at 888-798-2930.
Massachusetts & the Compliance Rule
Tuesday, December 29th, 2009Massachusetts is one of a handful of states that has expressly adopted the SEC Compliance Rule. In a Policy Statement issued by the Massachusetts Securities Division, it was noted that existing state regulations require state-registered investment advisers to adopt and implement written compliance policies and procedures in accordance with the provisions of the Compliance Rule. As a result, investment advisers registered in Massachusetts face many of the same stringent compliance requirements as do their SEC-registered colleagues.
In keeping with the requirements of the Compliance Rule, all Massachusetts-registered investment advisers must: (i) adopt and implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of state and federal securities laws; (ii) review the policies and procedures at least annually to determine their adequacy and effectiveness of their implementation; and (iii) designate a chief compliance officer responsible for administering the policies and procedures.
At a minimum, an adviser must adopt and implement written policies and procedures that address the following areas of compliance concern:
- Portfolio management processes, including allocation of investment opportunities among clients and consistency of portfolios with clients’ investment objectives, disclosures by the adviser, and applicable regulatory restrictions;
- Trading practices, including procedures by which the adviser satisfies its best execution obligation, uses client brokerage to obtain research and other services (”soft dollar arrangements”), and allocates aggregated trades among clients;
- Proprietary trading of the adviser and personal trading activities of supervised persons;
- The accuracy of disclosures made to investors, clients, and regulators, including account statements and advertisements;
- Safeguarding of client assets from conversion or inappropriate use by advisory personnel;
- The accurate creation of required records and their maintenance in a manner that secures them from unauthorized alteration or use and protects them from untimely destruction
- Marketing advisory services, including the use of solicitors
- Processes to value client holdings and assess fees based on those valuations;
- Safeguards for the privacy protection of client records and information; and
- Business continuity plans.
An important point to remember is that the Compliance Rule requires only that the policies and procedures be reasonably designed to prevent violation of the Advisers Act, and thus, need only encompass compliance considerations relevant to the operations of the adviser. Accordingly, smaller advisory firms without conflicting business interests may have much simpler policies and procedures than larger firms that may have multiple potential conflicts as a result of their other lines of business or their affiliations with other financial service firms.
I suggest that when developing its compliance manual, the investment advisory firm review the conduct of its advisory business and, if appropriate, make note of its limited nature. This should be done in the manual’s introductory material to let regulators know right up front that certain of the policies and procedures mandated by the Compliance Rule are not applicable to your advisory firm. It has been my experience that the easier you make it for regulators to understand the thought process behind the development of your compliance polices and procedures, the more likely it is that the regulators will not challenge the sufficiency of those policies and procedures.
Massachusetts Requires Code of Ethics
Tuesday, December 29th, 2009The Massachusetts Securities Division has strongly recommended that state-registered advisors adopt codes of ethics and generally comply with the Code of Ethics Rule adopted by the SEC. Pursuant to the Code of Ethics Rule, an investment adviser’s codes of ethics must, at a minimum:
- Set forth a standard of business conduct expected of advisory personnel. The standard chosen must reflect the adviser’s fiduciary obligations and those of its supervised persons, and must require compliance with the federal securities laws.
- Include provisions reasonably designed to prevent access to material non-public information about the adviser’s securities recommendations and client securities holdings and transactions.
- Require an adviser’s “access persons” to periodically report their personal securities transactions and holdings to the adviser’s chief compliance officer or other designated person.
- Require access persons to pre-clear investments in initial public offerings and private placements.
- Require prompt internal reporting of any violations of the code of ethics to the investment adviser’s chief compliance officer.
A question I often hear from single-member investment advisory firms is “do I need to pre-approve my own personal securities transactions”? The answer is no you do not. These advisers, however, should maintain careful records (e.g., brokerage account statements, trade confirmations) of their personal securities transactions and be prepared to explain any transactions that were either contrary to recommendations being given to the investment advisory firm’s clients or that were executed in advance of similar client trades. In addition, since it is typical in smaller investment advisory firms for all employees to have access to nonpublic information regarding clients’ purchase or sale of securities, I suggest that all employees be designated as “access persons” and brought under the umbrella of the firm’s personal trading policies and procedures.
When the SEC Calls, Will You be Ready?
Monday, December 28th, 2009The SEC requires each advisory firm to identify its unique set of risks as the starting point for developing its compliance policies and procedures. When the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations visits your office they will want to see your firm’s:
♦ Operational Risk Assessment Procedures
♦ Compliance Review Calendar
♦ Compliance Risk Assessment
♦ Conflict of Interest Assessment
♦ Risk Management Matrix
Can your advisory firm put a check mark next to each of these required documents? If not, it may be the difference between a deficiency letter and referral to the Division of Enforcement.
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Saturday, December 26th, 2009Earlier this month, the House approved the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 (the “Act”). Title V of the Act includes the Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act which requires advisers to private equity funds and other private pools of capital with assets under management of at least $150 million to register as an investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Section 203(b) of the Investment Advisers Act currently provides an exemption from the registration requirements to an investment adviser who, during any 12-month period, had fewer than 15 clients and who does not hold itself out generally to the public as an investment adviser. In counting the number of clients the fund itself, rather than the investors in any such fund, is treated as the client.
The 15-client exemption is eliminated under the Act, and is replaced with the general requirement that an investment adviser to any private equity fund or other private pool of capital must register with the SEC. The Act, however, provides the following exemptions from this registration requirement:
- Foreign Advisers
- Advisers to funds with less than $150 million in assets under management.
- Venture Capital Funds
The Act further requires registered advisers to maintain and file with the SEC records regarding the amount of assets under management, the use of leverage, including off-balance sheet leverage, counterparty credit risk exposures, trading and investment positions, trading practices and any other information the SEC or the Federal Reserve deem necessary and appropriate.
Top Compliance Events of the Decade
Friday, December 25th, 2009As we approach the end of the decade I thought it appropriate to list the top compliance events of the decade. Purely subjective, these events have, in my opinion, greatly influenced compliance in the investment advisory profession. I did leave out the obvious number one compliance event - the formation of U.S. Compliance Consultants in 2005 - because I did not want the list to seem self-serving. However, as we all know, everything else pales in comparison. So, without further ado, the top compliance events of the past ten years are:
1. September 2008. Collapse of Lehman Brothers; Seizing-up of the credit markets; Stock market collapse. Auction rate securities frozen. Housing collapse. Mortgage market collapse. Banks collapsing. Recession. Depression (at least among those working in the financial industry). Sweeping regulatory reform. Enough said.
2. The Compliance Rule. The passage of the compliance rule in 2003 changed the way every SEC and state registered investment adviser approached compliance.
3. Madoff. A watershed event as people will talk about the investment advisory profession as before-Madoff and after-Madoff.
4. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. True, this was enacted in late 1999, but the Financial Privacy Rules and the Safeguard Rules all came during this decade and had a huge impact on how investment advisers conduct their advisory business.
5. Late Trading Scandal. Although almost quaint by today’s standards, the mutual fund late-trading scandal in 2003 was the impetus behind the enactment of the Code of Ethics Rule as well as the SEC’s interest in having investment advisers retain and archive their electronic communications.
6. Hedge Fund Registration/Hedge Fund De-Registration. Bringing the “bad boys” of the financial industry under the watchful eye of the SEC and then the bad boy of the hedge fund industry (at least from the SEC’s point of view) challenging the SEC and winning. One wonders if this body blow to the authority of the SEC had any impact on its willingness to stand up to Madoff.
7. ENRON. How quickly we forget, but the ENRON scandal resulted in the largest bankruptcy in American history up to that time. It also wiped out Arthur Andersen.
Disclosure Basics - Part III
Thursday, December 24th, 2009Filing and Updating
Advisers are required to promptly file an amended Part 1 of their Form ADV if information the adviser provided in response to Item 1 (Identifying Information); Item 3 (Form of Organization); or Item 11 (Disclosure Information) becomes inaccurate in any way or information the adviser provided in response to Item 4 (Successions); Item 8 (Interest in Client Transactions); or Item 10 (Control Persons) become materially inaccurate in any way. In addition, an adviser is required to amend Part II of the Form ADV if becomes materially inaccurate in any way.
Many states now require state-registered advisers to file all amendments to Form ADV Part II and Schedule F via the IARD system. Advisers should note that they will not be able to just “download” their existing Form ADV Part II or Schedule F and must go to the web site of the North American Securities Administrators Association (www.nasaa.org) to obtain the appropriate form. Advisers should be aware our initial experience has been that these forms are not exactly user friendly.
Recordkeeping
Advisers must keep a copy of their disclosure document and each amendment or revision to such document that was given, or offered to be given, to any client or prospective client who subsequently becomes a client. An adviser must also keep a record of the dates that each disclosure document and each amendment or revision was offered or sent to clients. We suggest that advisers print out a list of clients to whom the Form ADV Part II was offered and staple a copy of that specific version of Part II to such list. There is no need for an adviser to save a copy of the annual offer in each separate client file.
Lessons Learned
Beyond lack of disclosures, beyond incomplete disclosures and even beyond failure to disclose conflicts of interest, the most problematic disclosure issue is when there are discrepancies between an adviser’s disclosure documents. Examiners take an especially harsh view of investment advisers that fail to reconcile their disclosure documents. In the words of one examiner, the presence of conflicting disclosure documents is evidence that an adviser lacks a commitment to the disclosure process. Examiners will not afford an adviser the benefit of the doubt when confronted with such an abject disregard for their disclosure obligations. Therefore, we suggest that at a minimum, every adviser pull out Parts 1 and II of their Form ADV, their Schedule F and their advisory contract and make sure it all adds up. If you report in Part 1 that you have investment or brokerage discretion, your Part II better report the same thing. It sounds obvious, but at least 60% of our audit clients had some form of inconsistent disclosures. While adviser should review their disclosure documents in their entirety, special attention should be paid in Part 1 of their Form ADV to Items 7 (Financial Industry Affiliations) and 8 (Interest in Client Transactions) and the corresponding Items in their Form ADV Part II (e.g., Items 8, 9, 12 and 13). This is typically where examiners find the most inconsistencies.
Disclose, Disclose, Disclose (and then disclose some more!)
If the three most important words in real estate are “location, location, location” then the three most important words in compliance are “disclose, disclose, disclose.” Any time an adviser comes across a questionable situation our advice is to thoroughly disclose the issue. After all, why give an examiner even the slightest opportunity to question whether a disclosure should have been made? Perhaps one of the most important points to remember about the Investment Advisers Act is that short of fraud or other malfeasance, disclosure is the often the antidote to many of the issues that arise in the course of an investment adviser’s business.
Disclosure Basics - Part II
Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009Conflicts of Interest
The most common disclosure issue that arises during an examination is the inadequate reporting of conflicts of interest. Specifically, the types of roles the adviser and/or its affiliates play with regard to a client may create conflicts of interest. Some of the situations involving conflicts of interest examiners often look for include:
· Conflicts where the investment adviser is also the broker-dealer or the broker-dealer is an affiliate of the investment adviser;
· Conflicts where the investment adviser or its representatives has an ownership interest (or especially a controlling interest) in an issuer whose securities the adviser or its representatives recommends to its clients;
· Conflicts relating to the use of solicitors and finder’s fees;
· Conflicts between the investment adviser’s interest in trading for the adviser own account and the interests of clients;
· Conflicts where the adviser or its personnel participate in limited investment opportunities along with clients;
· Conflicts relating to the allocation of investment opportunities among clients;
· Conflicts relating to the aggregation and allocation of client trades;
· Conflicts relating to the use of client commissions to obtain soft dollar items; and
· Conflicts relating to side by side management of accounts that do and do not charge performance fees.
In order to determine whether a conflict exists, examiners will review client correspondences, complaints and statement of accounts or by operational review of the investment adviser itself and interviews with advisory personnel and clients. Once examiners determine that a conflict of interest does exist, they will expect that the adviser has disclosed any such conflict in the proper manner.
In all conflict situations the key issue is the effect of the conflict on the client. Has the client been told of the conflict? Has the client consented to the transaction despite the disclosed conflict? If the client consented, was the client in a position to evaluate the effect of the conflict on the client’s interest? Advisers must taken into account the client’s financial sophistication and investment experience as the more vulnerable or unsophisticated the client, the greater the burden is on the investment adviser to show that the client has knowingly consented to the conflict. Accordingly, disclosure and client consent may not always be sufficient remedies for conflicts of interest.

